This Old Camera: Pentax 67 Take Two.

Scroll down to content

This Old Camera: Pentax 67 Take Two.

Took a spin with this camera previously.

Why? If I am honest? It is gor-jus.

Look at that steampunk aesthetic magnificence!

So I decided to try it again with some urging by Hamish of 35mmc.

So what happened?

<Looks both ways to make sure the coast is clear of Instathreadface fanboys and pulls in close.>

I did not enjoy using it.

The weight is significant, but in isolation I can overlook that. What did do it in? (I am imagining a lot of questions today.) Welp.

  • Ergonomics did not match the aesthetic.
    • A wonderful thing to behold but not a camera that felt natural to actually hold.
    • Don’t scream at me 67-heads. Personal opinion.
    • Might have gotten used to it in isolation, but the list did not stop there.
  • I did not particularly enjoy the focusing experience.
    • I managed to hit focus on every pic this time around, but I was not as successful last time and was not confident about it this time. May just be a me thing admittedly.
  • Exposure needle has a mind of its own.
    • Would vanish and reappear as it wished with no tilt angle, prism smack, or ritual dance identified that could resurrect it with any consistency.
    • This happened last time and I thought it was the same camera years later, but confirmed that this was a different copy.
    • Which causes me to think…
  • How robust is this camera?
    • I am not talking about its ability to double as a melee weapon come the zombie apocolypse, because that would be right up this camera’s alley.
    • But I hear grumblings about issues with the chain, potential issues if certain steps are done out of order, and when you add the intermittently disappearing match needle window this concerns me.
  • Exposure count.
    • 10. And I am spoiled by the 15-16 exposures of 645 cameras.
    • Yes, the negatives are glorious massive things only taking a backseat to the even more massive 6×9 negatives, but I would choose more exposures over more film real estate if given an option.

Take all of that into consideration and if I were to purchase a Pentax medium format camera I would purchase either an OG 645 (again)…

Pentax 645
Ilford XP2 Pentax 645

…or an AF 645N (again).

16 of 16 - Provia 100F w/ Pentax 645N
Smith - Bain Portraits

Both great cameras. The latter of which I have purchased more than once. But both lost out to another in the end.

Not a better camera. But a better camera for me. All of my favorite attributes of the cameras above…

Fujifilm GA645 - CatLABS Color 100

…in a cargo pants pocket friendly form factor with a built in flash.

Fujifilm GA645

Where was I?

Right. Pentax 67.

All that being said, not only is this a good looking camera, it produces a gorgeous negative. Immediately obvious once I took it out of the daylight tank. Missed exposure twice. Once early on shooting into daylight. Second time was when the exposure needle vanished for the second or third time and I just winged it with whatever the last exposure reading was. This threw the color way off but there was a salvageable image as long as I converted them to B&W.

The lens.

Have fallen hard for this lens as applied to the GFX100S by way of a Kipon 67 to GF focal reducer adapter.

The film.

A favorite of mine. CatLABS X Film Color 100.

Pics below.

Pentax 67 - Test Roll
Pentax 67 - Test Roll - B&W Conversion
Pentax 67 - Test Roll
Pentax 67 - Test Roll
Pentax 67 - Test Roll
Pentax 67 - Test Roll
Pentax 67 - Test Roll
Pentax 67 - Test Roll
Pentax 67 - Test Roll - B&W Conversion
Pentax 67 - Test Roll

Thoughts.

A beautiful camera that creates beautiful negatives and photos.

But I am in it for the 67 lenses it seems.

So the camera went back home to the camera shop.

Again. A fine camera. I just prefer other options.

Happy capturing.

-ELW