Utter Nonsense Files: MC11 and Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM.

As stated previously I needed an MC11 adapter like a hole in the head.

I just had to come out and admit it. I will usually come up with some kitschy title along with some weak attempts to justify a purchase. It may end with an, “If you like odd duck… blah, blah, blah, etc. so on and so forth.”

But with this post series, I will make no attempts at such. These entries do not make a lick of sense. I just simply wanted them for whatever reason of my own imagining.

How I got here.

Step 1.

The 5D and friends.

Step 2.

Reasonably priced reminiscing.

I enjoyed the Cony 50mm f/1.8.

And to get this again, with two more lenses in tow than the first time, does not hurt the bank at less than $150 for the MC11.

Always knew I would eventually get it. But this was just delayed nonsense because I did not need more lenses for Sony. It is also nonsense because the MC11 has limitations. Let me get those out of the way first.

While standard issue stills focusing goes over well AF-C does not do particularly well. Additionally, video focusing is not a thing either. But…

…some sell lack of video as a feature but I will move on since I do not want to start anything and…

…as stated standard stills photography goes over well. And that is enough for me.

I could have started my reunion with the MC11 with the 50mm f/1.8 that inspired this nonsense. But I already know how that will go. Great.

For this MC11 entry, I will go with the root cause of this nonsense. The 50mm f/1.8 above.

So now adapted to Sony. These are repeat test images from familiar environments as I went about my day, followed by some thoughts.

Thoughts.

I like this lens. No surprises. I have long sung the praises of this lens.

Here is the crazy part. With all of the modern Sony conveniences…

• Live view.
• IBIS.
• Eye AF, human and animal.
• High ISO.

…,continuous and video AF put aside, the Sony makes things easier.

So. Does that mean I will be ridding myself of the Canon EOS twins?

What! No. This is nonsense corner. Easier does not mean better. For reasons outlined in posts about those cameras I thoroughly enjoy the native Canon experience. But it is nice to have other options.

Am I glad I got it? I am glad I imagined you asked.

Yep.

Do I recommend anyone else do this?

Um… still no.

Save yourself.

If I have an EOS body, film or digital, this lens is a no brainer. Yes.

If you have an RF body you can use a Canon adapter, as I once did,…

…then this lens is good but for a little more you could purchase the RF variant,…

…which I have also reviewed and heaped similar praise upon it.

But I really do like this lens. And it is so affordable. And they made an RF equivalent that is as good and also affordable. A Canon RF body and three STM primes would do it for me if I was so inclined. But there are other lenses I really like that have no RF equivalent. That being said a 50mm on par with the Canon f/1.8 STM, the one lens that I wish had a Sony equivalent, is part of the reason I have collected a menagerie of Sony lenses over the years… and now this 50mm f/1.8 STM again courtesy the MC11.

It is nonsense. But this nonsense is great fun to me. And in this world full of dark moments I will take all of the light I can get a hold of.

Happy capturing.

-ELW