In a recent post using the knock-off-ti-lux…
…I reminisced about how this lens has served me well ever since I first used it with the Voigtlander Bessa R2 years ago.
Has been used natively on film, manually adapted to other mounts, AF adapted to other mounts, and finally on native digital. It is a flawed lens wide open IQ wise but full of pleasant surprises… to me anyway.
As mentioned in recent posts, as fun as this has been I have decided to pair the M240 with another more grownup 50mm. The ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM.
Why?
Well…
After the “Would you look at that crazy bokeh.” thing wears off even I must admit the lens has other shortcomings. <Gasp.> That was me gasping at my own heresy after singing this lens’ (Still valid to me.) praises for so long. And “At this price point.” is implied throughout. All of these are easily forgiven taking that into consideration, but still valid. Here are the 7Artisans forgivable issues including how the ZEISS addressed them.
- Loose clickless aperture.
- No copy I have owned likes to stay on f/1.1 since the slightest nudge will move it. And this thing pretty much would stay on f/1.1 99% of the time. A click aperture will solve that.
- How the ZEISS addresses this:
- High quality clicked aperture that easily holds the aperture set.
- Build.
- Not bad… but not great. Hefty, but not a hewn from a solid piece feeling thing.
- How the ZEISS addresses this:
- Top notch build one would expect from a ZEISS lens. Quite a looker also.
- Infinity.
- Close up and for middle distances these lenses are fine. But I cannot say that I have had a copy that consistently focuses at far distances wide open.
- Now if you stop down to about to f/4 or f/5.6 or more you are good to go. But blowing the foreground to smithereens with the far distance in focus is not on the table in my experience.
- How the ZEISS addresses this:
- Infinity is infinity. Simple.
- Sometimes you are not looking for character.
- A lens like the Contax G Zeiss 45mm f/2 comes to mind. While this f/1.1 7Artisans entertains by its sheer oddity the Zeiss entertains by its sheer perfection in nearly every aspect of image capturing. I do not even invoke an, “In my opinion.” This is a lens I would put up against all glass regardless of price or pedigree… And it hints at what is to come.
- How the ZEISS addresses this:
- No surprises here. Top notch IQ that I would put up against any lens at any price point.
- Landscape.
- While not awful I did not buy this lens for accurate focus across the frame and it would be nice to have a grownup lens also.
- How the ZEISS addresses this:
- Again, as above, across the frame IQ that I would put up against any lens at any price point.
What led me to this lens?
Personal experience. I have other ZEISS lenses and hold them all in very high regard.
Stellar reviews. Read and watched reviews that pretty much put the performance of this lens on the same level as Leica M glass.
Value. While performance is compared to Leica 50mm f/2 lenses the ZEISS costs a fraction of the Leica alternatives. Closer in price to the, I am sure is also excellent, Voigtlander alternative new. For an added bit of value, I purchased my copy used.
One question that I only imagine has been asked is this.
Why the ZEISS Planar 50mm f/2 and not the ZEISS Sonnar 50mm f/1.5?
Sensible aperture.
It forces me to grow up aperture wise. While I know perfectly well that it is possible to stop lenses down, I rarely do. F/2 is a perfectly reasonable lens aperture.
Not looking for character.
A fellow ZEISS adherent mentioned that they have both and use the f/1.5 because it has more character. Makes sense. I was looking for straightforward IQ excellence, and not the character of the f/1.5.
Additional thoughts after it arrived.
Tiny and relatively light. This is great. One advantage of a rangefinder system is that they are compact. As much as I rave about ridiculously fast glass they bring a size and weight penalty I must admit makes less sense to me when using this lens. You do not feel the weight of the lens at all and the small size does not block the viewfinder.
Excellent build and aesthetics. Mentioned above but once it arrived both were better than I expected. The front chrome ring is a nice touch. The aperture and focus rings have a quality damped feel to them.
On to the image quality and user experience. In this post specifically used AF adapted with TECHART LM-EA7 to Sony FE.
As luck would have it a perfect use case made itself available this week. A workplace volunteer effort. The reason it is perfect is that photography was not the main concern that day. So AF would be beneficial. It also made handing off the camera to another possible. Something that cannot often be done with a rangefinder since not many are familiar with using them and a crash course is not usually an option. While accompanied by a bit of whirring and clicking using the TECHART adapter is no more complicated than any other Sony FE AF lens. Hand it off and let it rip.
Thoughts about the lens after using it adapted with AF. <Largely cut/paste/updated from the digital M post.>
Far from the first M mount lens I have used with the TECHART adapter, but this is my favorite so far. I did not expect that. Why? I am glad I imagined that you asked.
Colors.
So… a ZEISS lens having better colors than a 7Artisans lens is far from surprising. But it should be noted.
AF.
The lighter the lens the better the AF performance with the TECHART. Less weight to move about since the adapter uses back and forth motion to focus. Very swift. Many of the photos above were also taken on the move. Usually zone focusing would be the way to go with a rangefinder lens, but AF os on the table here. And as noted in Exhibit A photo above it can easily be handed off to anyone to take a photo.
Looks and feels the part.
Has no bearing on image quality, I will admit, but the A7C makes for quite the attractive old meets new steampunk-ish aesthetic.
Plenty of bokeh and subject isolation.
Had thought that I would be trading peerless IQ performance for less “fun” attributes like bokeh and subject isolation. But not so. It is more than acceptable for my needs which means there is less of a reason to use the faster 7Artisans. Leaves only IQ wonkiness as the main use case for the f/1.1 lens. I did not expect that.
Well, that is a wrap. This third of three posts wraps up my three use case series on the ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM.
In short, I really like it. While not surprised at all I do like it more than I expected to. So much so that while I expected to continue making regular use of the 7Artisans, mainly for subject isolation and low light scenarios I am now not so sure. It has me re-evaluating my whole Artisans line up if I am honest. Time will tell.
The gem of a lens TTArtisans 28mm f/5.6 is not going anywhere. Regardless of its humble pedigree, it is a near flawless lens. The goggle-ified 135mm Leica lens is not going anywhere. It is my sole Leica lens, was relatively inexpensive, and… it has goggles. So it is not going anywhere. But after a few days of using this lens my fascination with larger sub f/2 rangefinder lenses is waning. And small well built ZEISS lenses of humble aperture are looking very good. With the TTArtisans 28mm f/5.6 and goggle-rific Leica not going anywhere, I am thinking a ZM 21mm and possibly a ZM 85mm trio would be nice. Fairly certain about the first. Not so sure about the second.
Again. Time will tell. Will hold off for a while to see if the GAS mist clears. I do rather like my Artisans lenses.
But for now, I can say that I am very happy with this ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM.
Happy capturing.
-ELW
Eric L. Woods 