Sony a6000: When good enough is exactly what I am looking for.

I have lost count of how many times I have bought an a6000. I believe this is the third time.

Why the a6000 rather than the newer a6300/a6500 or newly released a6100/a6400/a6600?

Easy. Understanding what I do and do not need a second camera for.

What I do ~~need~~ want:

I would prefer to spend the least to meet my needs. And around ~~$330~~ $260 used fits nicely into my plan.
Added zoom reach. Was thinking of getting a 1.4X crop adapter for a spendy zoom I recently acquired, but these Sony adapters cost over $500. An a6000 brings a 1.5x crop, loses no light due to extra glass, comes with a whole camera attached, and costs hundreds less.
Fast and accurate 11fps constant AF tracking. Add that with the 1.5x reach and you have the makings of an oddly affordable and capable big lens/little camera sports solution. This dpreview I saw years ago stuck with me. Looking forward to marching band season, where football games break out before and after their playing, to try it out.
A backup camera in a pinch. Different crop, but perfectly serviceable with my existing full-frame glass.
Access to APS-C glass. Never warmed up to the 20mm Sony pancake, but I have been very happy with the pancake zoom and 10-18mm wide zoom.
A camera that pairs well with smaller vintage glass like the half-frame 40mm Olympus PEN FT.

What I do not need:

A sky-high price for an APS-C camera. An A7 used goes for around $500. Regardless of features, I am unlikely to pay more for a crop sensor camera.
4K. 1080p is good for me and I have a camera that does 4K if needed.
IBIS. Nice to have, but not a have to have for a second body.
Weather sealing. I rarely take cameras out in inclement weather even when they are well sealed.
Touch screen. Nice to have, but not entirely necessary.
Specs for specs sake. Just need enough to do what I need to do.

Welcome home a6000.

Thoughts so far? I am very pleased. Some samples below and here is an ongoing album.

Happy shooting.

-ELW