So… That New Leica D-Lux 8…

Scroll down to content

The Leica D-Lux 8.

I get it. It is a Leica. Look at it.

I would not fault anyone for purchasing one.

  • A good looking thing… That matters.
  • Has an impressive lens blessed with Leica credentials.
  • Surely it will create a fine image.
  • You get to say you have a Leica.

I also understand why some will balk. $1,600 is a big ask for what could be called a rebadged, refreshed Panasonic LX100 II. But if it makes one happy, why not?

Regular visitors know the drill here. Whatever floats your boat.

But, I lean towards the latter camp personally. I am not built to pay such a premium for features I could get elsewhere. And having a Leica name is not enough.

My fascination with Leica centers on their rangefinder offerings. I found this out when I purchased a different non rangefinder Leica years ago. The Leica Q.

Leica Q (Type 116)

It took a wonderful photo.

Leica Q (Type 116)
Leica Q
Leica Q
Leica Q
Leica Q (Type 116)

The issue was as nice as it was it was not a rangefinder. The main reason why I want a Leica. What I had was a very nice Leica lens perma-fixed to a very un Leica like camera (Not a rangefinder.) that was missing features I could find elsewhere. Namely:

  • Tilty-flippy screen.
  • Top notch phase detect AF.
  • Other lenses/focal lengths.

After much camera and lens experimentation, a more versatile setup won the day.

Sony FE 40mm f/2.5 G
A7C + 40mm f/2.5 G
Sony A7c - FE 40mm f/2.5 G
A7C/40mm f/2.5 G
A7C/40mm f/2.5 G
Sony A7C - FE 40mm f/2.5 G
Sony A7C - FE 40mm f/2.5 G
Sony A7C - FE 40mm f/2.5 G
Sony A7c - FE 40mm f/2.5 G
Sony A7c - FE 40mm f/2.5 G

A better solution for me. But I do understand the allure of a Q.

Back to the D-Lux 8.

Here we are looking at a different class of camera. A truly tiny camera class rather than the small for a full frame camera options above.

Many raise the prior D-Lux cameras and LX100 cameras that they are based on as options. And they are right. But while less than $1,600 they are still quite pricey for what are MFT cameras with a zoom lens. A fine Leica zoom, but a zoom where I prefer primes. Also similar to the Q, with no rangefinder I have no interest. And for mainly that reason I would go a different way. More accurately as a coincidence, I already did go that way.

Panasonic DMC GF1
GF1 – 20mm f/1.7 – 14-42mm PZ O.I.S.

There are significant compromises compared to the D-Lux 8.

  • Fewer MP.
  • No built in EVF.
  • No companion app.
  • While not a bad looking camera, the D-Lux 8 has been hit with the Leica appearance stick.

But if one wishes an optional (much lower resolution) EVF is available. Or one could step up to a larger GX8 or the like for a bit more spend. They also share a fixed back screen but the D-Lux 8 has a touch screen. But the GF1 also has its advantages.

  • Much lower cost.
    • I paid less for the GF1 than the price of the D-Lux 8’s grip.
    • I paid about the same for the GF1 and 20mm f/1.7 as the price of the case and strap for the D-Lux 8.
  • Even smaller.
  • Built in flash.
  • Interchangeable lenses.

That last one is enough for me alone. And they share another thing. They are both capable of creating great images.

Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 14-42mm PZ O.I.S.
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7
Panasonic DMC GF1 - Lumix 20mm f/1.7

So. No Leica on the front. But this would be my choice.

Leica M Type 240 - ZEISS Planar T* 50mm f/2 ZM

That being said I wish those the best who do purchase the Leica D-Lux 8.

Happy capturing.

-ELW